Home

iWatch News by The Center for Public Integrity

Follow @iWatch.

Home

About the Center

ICIJ: Global investigations

Donate

Politics

Health

Environment

Accountability

National Security

Juvenile Justice

National Security

Defense auditors tighten rules for contractors

By Nick Schwellenbach

2:45 pm, July 29, 2009 Updated: 7:20 pm, March 24, 2011

Print
E-mail
Tweet

The management of the Defense Contract Auditing Agency has issued new policies that extend the organization’s traditional green eyeshade mission into non-traditional matters of monitoring contractor ethics, according to an internal memo obtained by PaperTrail. And those changes are proving to be controversial, according to at least one lawyer who represents industry.

The memo, signed by DCAA’s Kenneth J. Saccoccia, assistant director for policy, was sent last Thursday to the agency’s regional directors and senior staff in its headquarters. It says contractors will now have “to disclose certain types of serious wrongdoing” in writing to the Defense Department’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG). A copy must also go to the DOD contracting officer, “whenever the contractor has credible evidence of such activity by a principal, employee, agent, or subcontractor.” The policy also decrees that contractors must provide “disciplinary action for improper conduct or for failing to take reasonable steps to prevent or detect improper conduct.”

DCAA is considered the taxpayers’ frontline of defense when the government deals with contractors. It audits contractor proposals, their internal business systems (such as accounting and billing systems) and audits their performance on contracts for the Defense Department and a wide swath of agencies, such as NASA and the Department of Homeland Security.

The DCAA has “become hyper-aggressive” since last fall, said Karen L. Manos, a partner at the law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, who has represented government contractors. Manos said DCAA’s audit programs “ought to have some connection to government contract cost” issues and DCAA, by looking at ethics, is veering into the territory of the inspectors general offices in various agencies. She said by looking at contractor ethics policies, “this detracts from [DCAA’s] primary mission.”

But not everyone agrees.

“It’s the Defense Contract Audit Agency, not the Defense Contract Accounting Agency,” said Richard C. Loeb, adjunct professor of government contract law at the University of Baltimore Law School. “While certainly I expect DCAA to audit contractor books and records, I also expect them to audit contractor business practices, which include their ethics programs,” Loeb said.

These policy changes come after allegations by DCAA whistleblowers of improper manipulation of audits led to a critical review by the Government Accountability Office and a high-profile Senate hearing last year. The Defense Department IG and GAO are due to come up with follow-up reports on other allegations of improper actions at DCAA soon.

Like our National Security coverage on Facebook and get the latest news instantly.
Advertisement

What we're working on

Projects, series, blogs and other investigations from the Center

Investigation

Consider the Source

Another Bain exec revealed as man behind corporate donor to pro-Romney super PAC

More stories ...

Investigation

Looting the Seas

'Free-for-all' decimates fish stocks in the southern Pacific

More stories ...

Investigation

Poisoned Places

Many Americans left behind in the quest for cleaner air

More stories ...

Investigation

The Great Mortgage Cover-Up

Countrywide protected fraudsters by silencing whistleblowers, say former employees

More stories ...

Investigation

Juvenile Justice

An epidemic of expulsions

More stories ...

Investigation

Raw Deal

Raging against the foreclosure machine

More stories ...

Popular on Facebook

You might also be interested in ...

GSA tracks contractors’ work in database off-limits to public

Surge in outsourcing creates problems in performance, oversight

The big business of small business

Powered by Calais
Advertisement

Donate

  • Make a donation online

  • Make a donation by mail

  • Make a contribution by fax or phone

  • Make a gift of stock

  • Rated 4-stars on Charity Navigator

Subscribe to our Weekly Watchdog email newsletter to find about our investigations.

What the Center investigates

About the Center

Center in the News

  • Politics

    • One Nation Under Debt
    • Consider the Source
    • Raw Deal
    • Congress
    • The White House
    • Elections
  • Health

    • Medicare
    • Public Health
    • Wendell Potter
    • Island of the Widows
    • Pushing Prescriptions
    • Genetics
  • Environment

    • Health and Safety
    • Energy
    • Pollution
    • Climate
    • Natural Resources
  • Accountability

    • Finance
    • Harmful Error
    • Morning Tip Sheet
    • Education
    • State Integrity Investigation
    • The Truth Left Behind
    • Global Muckraking
    • ICIJ Member Stories
    • Lobby Watch
    • Campaign Consultants
    • Iraq: The War Card
    • Well Connected
    • Waste, Fraud and Abuse
  • National Security

    • Homeland Security
    • The Military
    • Intelligence
    • Outsourcing the Pentagon
    • Windfalls of War
  • Juvenile Justice

    • About The Center for Public Integrity

    • Our Organization

    • Our People

    • Our Work

    • About the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

    • Contact Us

    • Advertise

    • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

    • Susan Ferriss discusses youth in prison with KQED

    • Weekly Watchdog 2/2/12

    • John Dunbar talks year-end super PAC disclosure on PBS NewsHour

    • Center, NPR finalist for Goldsmith journalism prize

    • Weekly Watchdog 1/26/12

    • John Dunbar discusses super PACs on PBS NewsHour

    • International Consortium Adds 41 Investigative Journalists

    • The weekly watchdog: Dec. 12 - Dec. 16

    Copyright 2012 The Center for Public Integrity

    Supported by: