Home

iWatch News by The Center for Public Integrity

Follow @iWatch.

Home

About the Center

ICIJ: Global investigations

Donate

Politics

Health

Environment

Accountability

National Security

Juvenile Justice

Environment : Energy : Coal Ash

By releasing coal ash sites, EPA raises more questions

By Kristen Lombardi

4:48 pm, June 30, 2009 Updated: 12:26 pm, June 10, 2011

Print
E-mail
Tweet

Last February, in a four-month investigation into the dangers of coal ash, the Center covered the notorious, ash-laden water in Colstrip, Montana, home to a behemoth coal-fired power plant known by the same name. Now, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has revealed that the Colstrip plant’s ash ponds — the ones responsible for all that toxic water — are on its much-anticipated list of 44 potentially highly dangerous coal-ash dumpsites nationwide.

Yesterday, the EPA disclosed the ash ponds identified as “high hazard” on its website, reversing its prior position of keeping their locations secret. The list of 44 reveals that 26 power companies, including PPLMontana, maintain ash ponds that, were they to burst like that disastrous coal-ash spill in Tennessee last December, would cause property damage and loss of life.

Coal ash is the toxic byproduct of burning coal to generate electricity. For lack of a safer disposal method, at least 70 millions tons of coal ash is dumped annually into ponds or landfills in states across the country.

“By compiling a list of these facilities,” EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said in a press statement. “EPA will be better able to identify and reduce potential risks.”

Lisa Evans, of EarthJustice, one of four environmental groups that filed a records request for the list last week, applauded the EPA’s move toward openness. Still, she told Papertrail, “The list raises as many questions as it answers.” For instance, the utility that first sparked the EPA inquiry into ash ponds — the Tennessee Valley Authority — remains conspicuously absent from the list. “Isn’t it suspicious that you don’t find TVA on the list?” Evans asks, adding, “Because this stuff has been unregulated for so long, it’s going to take an equally long time to tease out all the information that we need to know” from the power industry and from EPA.

Responding to Papertrail’s inquiries, an agency spokeswoman confirmed that “the TVA sites were not classified as high hazard potential dams and thus were not part of the 44.” She said that the primary reason for such a classification is for dams “where failure or mis-operation will probably cause a loss of human life.”

In Montana, meanwhile, Jory Ruggiero, the lawyer for the 57 Colstrip residents who won a $25 million settlement because of the coal-ash contamination there, noted the bigger irony to this latest development: That the possible rupture of Colstrip’s ash ponds seems the least of people’s worries. “The far more insidious danger is the contamination caused by coal ash in groundwater,” Ruggiero says. “What’s far more hazardous for the people of Colstrip today is the lack of a proper clean up.”

That might be true as well for the rest of the 44 “high hazard” sites. EPA’s list, as Papertrail reported, covers 10 states — Arizona, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Montana, Ohio, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Most sites — 20 of them and seven with multiple ash ponds — overlap with the more than 400 ash ponds and landfills that the Center plotted on its coal-ash map.

Like our Environment coverage on Facebook and get the latest news instantly.

You might also be interested in ...

EPA releases utilities' plans to make coal ash storage safer

EPA scolded for website that appeared to endorse coal ash products

"Beneficial use" of Coal Ash in question as EPA mulls regulation

Powered by Calais
Advertisement

What we're working on

Projects, series, blogs and other investigations from the Center

Investigation

Consider the Source

Presidential super PACs raise $49 million through December

More stories ...

Investigation

Looting the Seas

'Free-for-all' decimates fish stocks in the southern Pacific

More stories ...

Investigation

Poisoned Places

Many Americans left behind in the quest for cleaner air

More stories ...

Investigation

The Great Mortgage Cover-Up

Countrywide protected fraudsters by silencing whistleblowers, say former employees

More stories ...

Investigation

Juvenile Justice

An epidemic of expulsions

More stories ...

Investigation

Raw Deal

Raging against the foreclosure machine

More stories ...

Popular on Facebook

What we investigate

Who we are

  • Politics

    • One Nation Under Debt
    • Consider the Source
    • Raw Deal
    • Congress
    • The White House
    • Elections
  • Health

    • Medicare
    • Public Health
    • Wendell Potter
    • Island of the Widows
    • Pushing Prescriptions
    • Genetics
  • Environment

    • Health and Safety
    • Energy
    • Pollution
    • Climate
    • Natural Resources
  • Accountability

    • Finance
    • Harmful Error
    • Morning Tip Sheet
    • Education
    • State Integrity Investigation
    • The Truth Left Behind
    • Global Muckraking
    • ICIJ Member Stories
    • Lobby Watch
    • Campaign Consultants
    • Iraq: The War Card
    • Well Connected
    • Waste, Fraud and Abuse
  • National Security

    • Homeland Security
    • The Military
    • Intelligence
    • Outsourcing the Pentagon
    • Windfalls of War
  • Juvenile Justice

    • iWatch in the News

      • About The Center for Public Integrity

      • Our Organization

      • Our People

      • Our Work

      • About the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

      • Contact Us

      • Advertise

      • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use