Home

iWatch News by The Center for Public Integrity

Follow @iWatch.

Home

About the Center

ICIJ: Global investigations

Donate

Politics

Health

Environment

Accountability

National Security

Juvenile Justice

Accountability

Lines at the polls: A tale of two neighborhoods

By Sarah Laskow

10:30 pm, November 4, 2008 Updated: 12:30 pm, March 20, 2011

Print
E-mail
Tweet

I waited almost two hours to vote today in Mt. Pleasant, my neighborhood in D.C. Andrew, our web editor, lives one neighborhood over in Columbia Heights, but waited only about five minutes. Why did I have to wait while he breezed through?

I arrived at my polling place at 9:35 a.m. I waited in a line that snaked out the door, around the perimeter of a small parking lot, and down the block. I finally voted and walked out the door at 11:20 a.m. Andrew walked into his polling place shortly before I started waiting, got his ballot, voted, and left. It took five minutes, tops.

One definite difference between our two polling places: My precinct has more than twice as many voters registered as Andrew’s (4,839 vs. 2,117). My list was divided into six check-in stations, as opposed to the four at his polling place, which means about 800 people could pass through each check-in station at my polling place, while about 500 would go through each line at Andrew’s. But is that enough of a difference to account for my wait?

One of the big roadblocks to understanding Election Day problems like long lines at polling places is that there aren’t always that much data to look at. Back in April, two graduate students at the University of California, Berkeley, released one of the only academic studies of polling place lines ever. Their work is “the first systematic attempt to determine how common lines are,” they wrote, but their report mostly looked at data collection methods, not the root causes of lines.

After the eight-hour waits to vote in Ohio during the 2004 election, some critics were quick to point to the lines as evidence of voter suppression. Perhaps. But it’s unlikely that some political operative was trying to suppress my vote and not Andrew’s, as there’s no question that Obama will claim D.C.’s three electoral votes. (Thank you, 23rd Amendment!) Both of our neighborhoods are in the same ZIP code and have demographically similar populations.

And yet, because of this morning’s long line, some voters in my precinct probably were dissuaded from casting a ballot. There were people waiting in line who were vocally anxious about running late for work, while others with similar concerns probably didn’t get in line to begin with. Even without intentional election manipulation, it seems clear that there are inefficiencies in our election systems that make it easier for some people to vote than others.

Like our Accountability coverage on Facebook and get the latest news instantly.
Advertisement

What we're working on

Projects, series, blogs and other investigations from the Center

Investigation

Consider the Source

Another Bain exec revealed as man behind corporate donor to pro-Romney super PAC

More stories ...

Investigation

Looting the Seas

'Free-for-all' decimates fish stocks in the southern Pacific

More stories ...

Investigation

Poisoned Places

Many Americans left behind in the quest for cleaner air

More stories ...

Investigation

The Great Mortgage Cover-Up

Countrywide protected fraudsters by silencing whistleblowers, say former employees

More stories ...

Investigation

Juvenile Justice

An epidemic of expulsions

More stories ...

Investigation

Raw Deal

Raging against the foreclosure machine

More stories ...

Popular on Facebook

You might also be interested in ...

Consultant profile: Mark Mellman (The Mellman Group)

Secretaries of state drawing political fire

Internet voting project cost Pentagon $73,809 per vote

Powered by Calais
Advertisement

Donate

  • Make a donation online

  • Make a donation by mail

  • Make a contribution by fax or phone

  • Make a gift of stock

  • Rated 4-stars on Charity Navigator

Subscribe to our Weekly Watchdog email newsletter to find about our investigations.

What the Center investigates

About the Center

Center in the News

  • Politics

    • One Nation Under Debt
    • Consider the Source
    • Raw Deal
    • Congress
    • The White House
    • Elections
  • Health

    • Medicare
    • Public Health
    • Wendell Potter
    • Island of the Widows
    • Pushing Prescriptions
    • Genetics
  • Environment

    • Health and Safety
    • Energy
    • Pollution
    • Climate
    • Natural Resources
  • Accountability

    • Finance
    • Harmful Error
    • Morning Tip Sheet
    • Education
    • State Integrity Investigation
    • The Truth Left Behind
    • Global Muckraking
    • ICIJ Member Stories
    • Lobby Watch
    • Campaign Consultants
    • Iraq: The War Card
    • Well Connected
    • Waste, Fraud and Abuse
  • National Security

    • Homeland Security
    • The Military
    • Intelligence
    • Outsourcing the Pentagon
    • Windfalls of War
  • Juvenile Justice

    • About The Center for Public Integrity

    • Our Organization

    • Our People

    • Our Work

    • About the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

    • Contact Us

    • Advertise

    • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

    • Susan Ferriss discusses youth in prison with KQED

    • Weekly Watchdog 2/2/12

    • John Dunbar talks year-end super PAC disclosure on PBS NewsHour

    • Center, NPR finalist for Goldsmith journalism prize

    • Weekly Watchdog 1/26/12

    • John Dunbar discusses super PACs on PBS NewsHour

    • International Consortium Adds 41 Investigative Journalists

    • The weekly watchdog: Dec. 12 - Dec. 16

    Copyright 2012 The Center for Public Integrity

    Supported by: