Home

iWatch News by The Center for Public Integrity

Follow @iWatch.

Home

About the Center

ICIJ: Global investigations

Donate

Politics

Health

Environment

Accountability

National Security

Juvenile Justice

Environment

Amid record profits, Exxon tries to shirk interest payments in Valdez oil spill case

By Marianne Lavelle

4:02 pm, October 31, 2008 Updated: 11:00 am, March 25, 2011

Print
E-mail
Tweet

At the same time that ExxonMobil was racking up the largest quarterly profit of any U.S. company in history — $14.8 billion — the oil giant was fighting in court to avoid making the interest payment in the long-running case brought by victims of the 1989 Valdez supertanker spill in Alaska. In case you were wondering, the sum the plaintiffs say Exxon owes in interest, about $500 million, is about three days’ worth of company profits.

It looked this summer as if the litigation over the worst oil spill in the nation’s history had finally come to an end when the Supreme Court ruled in Exxon’s favor, slashing a $2.5 billion punitive damages award against the company to just $500 million. But lawyers for the commercial fishermen, cannery workers, and native Alaskans who brought the case maintain that Exxon owes $500 million on top of that sum — 12 years’ worth of interest. They say payment in such cases typically accumulates at the federal discount interest rate in effect on the date of the original judgment: in this case, Sept. 24, 1996. Exxon’s protest, they said, is “a futile attempt to dodge the precedents of this and other [appeals courts].”

But Exxon argues that it should only owe interest from last June 25, the date of the Supreme Court decision, not from the time of what it calls the “original, unlawful, and now-vacated and modified judgment.”

Exxon happened to be reporting its record-shattering earnings the same week that final briefs on the interest issue were due in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The earnings release shows Exxon spent $8 billion — 16 times the amount of interest in dispute in the Valdez case — just buying back its own stock, a way of returning money to its shareholders.

Those hurt by the oil spill in Prince William Sound, meanwhile, have not received a penny of the punitive damages they are owed — although, in part, that isn’t Exxon’s fault. Just as distribution was to begin this month, one plaintiff — Sea Hawk Seafoods, a Seattle-based company that ran a fish-processing plant in Valdez — challenged the formula the court has arrived at to divide up the money. So that dispute has to be battled out before a judge prior to any money being distributed.

The average amount the victims are awaiting: $15,000 each, or double that if Exxon is forced to pay interest.

Like our Environment coverage on Facebook and get the latest news instantly.
Advertisement

What we're working on

Projects, series, blogs and other investigations from the Center

Investigation

Consider the Source

Presidential super PACs raise $49 million through December

More stories ...

Investigation

Looting the Seas

'Free-for-all' decimates fish stocks in the southern Pacific

More stories ...

Investigation

Poisoned Places

Many Americans left behind in the quest for cleaner air

More stories ...

Investigation

The Great Mortgage Cover-Up

Countrywide protected fraudsters by silencing whistleblowers, say former employees

More stories ...

Investigation

Juvenile Justice

An epidemic of expulsions

More stories ...

Investigation

Raw Deal

Raging against the foreclosure machine

More stories ...

Popular on Facebook

You might also be interested in ...

Chamber of Commerce, other biz lobbies drill big oil for new cash gusher

Oil spill cleanup fund is running out of money

Safety risks underscored by violations at ExxonMobil refinery

Powered by Calais
Advertisement

Donate

  • Make a donation online

  • Make a donation by mail

  • Make a contribution by fax or phone

  • Make a gift of stock

  • Rated 4-stars on Charity Navigator

Subscribe to our Weekly Watchdog email newsletter to find about our investigations.

What the Center investigates

About the Center

Center in the News

  • Politics

    • One Nation Under Debt
    • Consider the Source
    • Raw Deal
    • Congress
    • The White House
    • Elections
  • Health

    • Medicare
    • Public Health
    • Wendell Potter
    • Island of the Widows
    • Pushing Prescriptions
    • Genetics
  • Environment

    • Health and Safety
    • Energy
    • Pollution
    • Climate
    • Natural Resources
  • Accountability

    • Finance
    • Harmful Error
    • Morning Tip Sheet
    • Education
    • State Integrity Investigation
    • The Truth Left Behind
    • Global Muckraking
    • ICIJ Member Stories
    • Lobby Watch
    • Campaign Consultants
    • Iraq: The War Card
    • Well Connected
    • Waste, Fraud and Abuse
  • National Security

    • Homeland Security
    • The Military
    • Intelligence
    • Outsourcing the Pentagon
    • Windfalls of War
  • Juvenile Justice

    • About The Center for Public Integrity

    • Our Organization

    • Our People

    • Our Work

    • About the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

    • Contact Us

    • Advertise

    • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

    • John Dunbar talks year-end super PAC disclosure on PBS NewsHour

    • Center, NPR finalist for Goldsmith journalism prize

    • Weekly Watchdog 1/26/12

    • John Dunbar discusses super PACs on PBS NewsHour

    • International Consortium Adds 41 Investigative Journalists

    • The weekly watchdog: Dec. 12 - Dec. 16

    • Center garners top journalism awards

    • The weekly watchdog: Dec. 5 - Dec. 9

    Copyright 2012 The Center for Public Integrity

    Supported by: